I also agree entirely.
Hey there. All the eureka of Ballistics asks for is for the Forts to be inside your territory, which means anywhere inside of your Borders.
1. You should be able to buy one. Make sure the Holy Site is free of obstructions and you have enough faith, maybe.
2. You can't promote a unit that's used up all of its movement points.
3. Oddly enough this seems to be missing at the moment.
Does it really? That's a great question, we'll probably have to investigate in-game to find out.
I suspect it will be linked directly to the "era" your civilization is in. (As well of course as the gamespeed and selected starting era)
I like the concept, though maybe the globe is a bit too blurry.
Ideally it should look good in Wikia Wordmark format, which is 250px wide and 65px high.
Also there's the question of whether the brand name should be Civilization Wiki or Civ Wiki?
Thanks for the concept!
Depending on how exactly Russia's civ ability works, I think they could be ridiculously powerful. If they get lucky with their tundra hills that is.
France looks a bit underwhelming right now but that's probably because we don't understand the full extent of their capabilities yet.
Hey there, we've started checking out Discussions more often recently. Of course feel free to edit anything you think needs it!
@Zero That's not bat at all, though it's hard to read the text. I guess I was thinking the globe could be next to the "Civ Wiki" text or only have the "Civ" part on top of it but that works. Gotta keep it short.
If we're to come up with a logo we'll probably want to use it for the wordmark.
@GoSciuPlayer The logo's going to change very soon, so you might want to use that.
In an ideal world we'd probably want our own design, a logo that just speaks Civilization wiki but isn't associated with one particular game of the Civ series and doesn't have Firaxis copyrighted material in it.
Of course saying this doesn't help you find a replacement image right now... I could see it being a stylized globe with the words Civ Wiki?
This small description would be useful for mobile pages, which always view the infobox before the rest of the article. Of course not all template types will have as easy a wording as this technology.
For instance what would be the wording for a leader? I can't think of a good one.
As of right now I think I'd rather have it be a caption because I don't see why it should stand out on its own compared to other elements of the infobox. The caption is the perfect place for misc information about the object represented by the infobox.
I wouldn't mind the group header but I just feel it attracts undeserved attention and a page with both a caption and this description header might be a bit odd looking.
In the future I might look into styling the Desktop version of templates to set them apart from one another.
I'd be surprised but I suppose its not impossible.
In Civ6 many elements can be unlocked through both technologies or civics.
There's 3 ways I see to go about this:
Option 1: Have a field named "Technology/Civic required"
Option 2: Have a field named "Advance required". Advance should be a clear enough word to represent both concepts
Option 3: Have 2 separate fields. Unused fields are hidden so you'll only ever see one of them at a time.
Upon further reflection I think I'd rather go with Option 3. Its the cleanest.
Hello then! Here looking forward to Civ6? :)
That's an interesting idea! Another way to go about it would be to have all of modding go under a Modding/ page, or ask wikia for a new namespace.
I know we're supposed to have a lot of Civ4 related modding info but we kinda dropped the ball when it comes up Civ5. So coming up with a standardized way to do this is fairly important.
Sadly the beyond earth tech web wouldn't work in Civ6. The tech tree does a much better job of representing progress over time, but now they split it into 2 with a Civics tree!
About technology articles, I believe the right form is one article listing all techs and another explaining the concept and mechanics around techs.
Yeah sorry to say I don't have that much time I can spend on the wiki right now, and in that time Civ 6 does take priority. You've been doing pretty great though!
I really love that they're marketing it as "All the good things from Civ5, but better!" and that's what it appears to be so far.
My favorite thing about Civ6 so far is how varied the civs are in their gameplay.
It's interesting to me that even though diplomatic victory is out for now, there's a bigger focus on diplomacy ever in this game!
Maybe taking out the diplomatic victory was the only way for it to make sense to enter diplomatic alliances and negotiations with your fellow players now that you supporting them doesn't give them the victory straight up.
Loving how different all of the civs are from one another!
Expansion is indeed the name of the game with those guys. They don't get any bonuses to actually creating settlers but are heavily encouraged to make that their main focus, so they can get their bonuses early in the game where they matter and set them apart.
Just the same it looks like a roman player who wants to go relatively tall (After securing 3-4 city spots) will have great defensive tools and will be hard to overpower early on.
No matter how you play them Rome should be pretty good at dictating their own terms.
There's a new podcast about everything Civ6, and they're off to a pretty good start!
Go ahead and check em out.