(Doesn’t really matter; I’ve moved on) |
m (→top: replaced: [[category: → [[Category:) |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | [[ |
+ | [[Category:naming conventions]] |
{{Forumheader|C-evo forum}} |
{{Forumheader|C-evo forum}} |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
:Doesn't really matter. My goal in getting the C-evo HOWTO up here is so people playing C-evo have an introductory-level text getting them started with C-evo. I’ve written the text, it is done, and I’ve moved on (back to working on my [http://maradns.org DNS server project], which I want to finish up by mid-2010). [[User:Strenholme|Strenholme]] 18:36, December 20, 2009 (UTC) |
:Doesn't really matter. My goal in getting the C-evo HOWTO up here is so people playing C-evo have an introductory-level text getting them started with C-evo. I’ve written the text, it is done, and I’ve moved on (back to working on my [http://maradns.org DNS server project], which I want to finish up by mid-2010). [[User:Strenholme|Strenholme]] 18:36, December 20, 2009 (UTC) |
||
+ | |||
+ | ::Great contribution there, Strenholme! I may add a few links now that we are settling on page naming standards. — [[User:Robin Patterson|Robin Patterson]] [[User talk:Robin Patterson|(Talk)]] 23:20, November 26, 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | |||
+ | ==2010== |
||
+ | Other games, since the merger with Civ4 and Civ5 wikis, are all standardizing on the short forms, e.g. [[Temple (Civ4)]] and [[Units (Civ5)]]. C-evo should follow that, so as to maximize time-saving with templates etc. Even where a name is unique to C-evo, there may be value in having the actual page in the standard form, with a redirect to it for easy text-writing. — [[User:Robin Patterson|Robin Patterson]] [[User talk:Robin Patterson|(Talk)]] 23:20, November 26, 2010 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 12:55, 16 June 2021
For uniformity and predictability, as well as for easy relating to other games that use similar terms, we should decide a number of things about page naming before starting too many.
Related discussions are on Forum:Rearrangement of categories.
I rather like the short forms, e.g. Temple (C-evo) and Units (C-evo).
Anything unique to C-evo needs no distinguishing feature in its name.
I see some of the C-evo HOWTO subpages use colons, as is the standard on the Towns, Villages and Cities wiki. That has some appeal, but the use of standard subpages (using a slash) has its advantages too, one being that they have an automatic link to the base page.
— Robin Patterson (Talk) 23:46, December 15, 2009 (UTC)
- Doesn't really matter. My goal in getting the C-evo HOWTO up here is so people playing C-evo have an introductory-level text getting them started with C-evo. I’ve written the text, it is done, and I’ve moved on (back to working on my DNS server project, which I want to finish up by mid-2010). Strenholme 18:36, December 20, 2009 (UTC)
- Great contribution there, Strenholme! I may add a few links now that we are settling on page naming standards. — Robin Patterson (Talk) 23:20, November 26, 2010 (UTC)
2010[]
Other games, since the merger with Civ4 and Civ5 wikis, are all standardizing on the short forms, e.g. Temple (Civ4) and Units (Civ5). C-evo should follow that, so as to maximize time-saving with templates etc. Even where a name is unique to C-evo, there may be value in having the actual page in the standard form, with a redirect to it for easy text-writing. — Robin Patterson (Talk) 23:20, November 26, 2010 (UTC)