FANDOM


Social Policies information has been updated to match the content of the Civilopedia as of the June/July patch, including gramatical errors. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nebular (talkcontribs) 19 July 2011

Great, thanks! —ZeroOne (talk / @) 22:21, September 18, 2011 (UTC)

BNWEdit

We'll need maybe a separate page for the Brave New World Social policies. Any administrator?

I left User:Becer a message on his talk page, he's the master mind behind the tab-like article version selection system. —ZeroOne (talk / @) 22:19, July 22, 2013 (UTC)
THe taba ppeared, thanks! Soltan Gris 06:12, July 23, 2013 (UTC)

Guys, we have a serious problem with the tab selection system. You probably noticed already, but the total number of policy branches are different in Vanilla and G&K, and in BNW (there's one less branch in BNW). Because of that, the tab selection system actually doesn't work, because it has to select always from an equal number of items! Before, this extra branch would always appear in BNW, messing up the order and confusing everything. Now, somebody made an edit which fixes the extra branch showing in BNW, but it hides the Order branch in both Vanilla and G&K! 

So... we have a problem :) Ideas? Soltan Gris 12:23, May 7, 2014 (UTC)


Guys, there is a problem in Tradition Finishing Bonus description: this page tells it gives 15% growth to ALL cities, and page Social Strategy points that it boosts growth in FIRST 4 cities.

The description in this page is correct. The in-game description is wrong, or at least has a very confusing wording. The +15% growth is empire-wide and is not limited to the number of cities. Benji Barraquias (talk) 17:08, September 7, 2015 (UTC)

Order Edit

So... where did Order go? It's not on the Vanilla or G&K list despite being in those versions. Rod (talk) 00:40, January 23, 2018 (UTC)

Huh, good point – as you say, even using the version selector tab, it isn't visible. I'll have a look into it in the code! Techhead7890 Talk Contribs 11:11, April 27, 2018 (UTC)

Liberty section edit spam Edit

Apologies for the many edits between these diffs. In particular, please ignore these two edits around 00:45, April 12, 2018 – those were because of a simultaneous edit to Template:ToggleParam5 in which I had zapped a parameter 15 minutes earlier. It should be all fixed now, but do let me know if there are any problems. I'll try and keep these multiple-edit summaries shorter so they don't make a line break! Techhead7890 Talk Contribs 11:31, April 27, 2018 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.