Merge request[]
{{merge|Units (Civ6)}}
Well, I'd second that, except that I feel this will make Units too long. Or maybe then we should consider removing the list of units which currently resides in Units (Civ6) in its own article? Soltan Gris 23:44, November 6, 2016 (UTC)
- Too long? How do you define "too long"? We don't have any rules on how long articles are allowed. —ZeroOne (talk) 19:50, November 14, 2016 (UTC)
- Well, if you feel it's fine to have all the info here and then the entire list of Units, then I have nothing against merging them. For Civ 5 for example there are 2 separate articles - Units and List of Units. But here the Units article is in fact a List of Units already. That's why I created a separate article.
- Soltan Gris 20:00, November 14, 2016 (UTC)
- No opinion about the request, but here I've disabled
{{merge|Units (Civ6)}}to get this talk page out of Category:Pages_that_need_merging shown on Project:Current_events. –Dunnoob 💩 08:10, November 29, 2017 (UTC)
- I know I am 2.5 years late with this, the convention seen on the rest of this site seems to be the Page Titled "Units" being the equivelent of this page, and a separate "List of Units" page being for the actual list units.
- See: